Editorial Policy | ShamimGuide — How We Review & What We Stand For
📋 How We Work — Full Transparency

Our Editorial Policy

Everything we publish is governed by strict standards. This page explains exactly how we select topics, review products, verify facts, handle conflicts of interest, and correct mistakes.

📅 Last Updated: May 2026
🔍 Growing Review Library
🩺 Medically Reviewed
🔬

Evidence-Based Only

PubMed & peer-reviewed sources

🛡️

Editorially Independent

No paid placements or sponsored ratings

🩺

Medically Reviewed

Board-certified physician on the team

✏️

Transparent Corrections

Errors corrected & publicly noted

📋

Why We Publish This Policy

Trust is earned through transparency. This editorial policy exists so that every reader, brand, and researcher can fully understand how ShamimGuide produces content, who is responsible for it, and what standards govern every publishing decision we make.

01

Our Editorial Mission

ShamimGuide's editorial mission is to cut through the noise in the health and supplement industry by providing readers with honest, evidence-based product reviews, health information, and wellness guidance they can actually rely on.

The supplement and health product industry is riddled with misleading claims, sponsored "reviews," and financial conflicts of interest that are never disclosed. We exist to be the resource we all wish we had — genuinely independent, thoroughly researched, and always reader-first.

Our core editorial principle: Every article, review, and guide published on ShamimGuide must be something we would be comfortable recommending to a close family member. If we wouldn't stand behind it personally, it does not get published.

02

Editorial Independence

ShamimGuide maintains complete editorial independence from the brands, manufacturers, and retailers whose products we review. This independence is non-negotiable and is upheld through the following policies:

✅ We ALWAYS Do This

  • Evaluate products on evidence-based merit alone
  • Publish negative and mixed reviews when earned
  • Disclose all affiliate relationships clearly
  • Include pros AND cons in every review
  • Update reviews when facts change
  • Attribute all content to named authors
  • Cite peer-reviewed sources for all claims
  • Apply identical criteria regardless of brand size

✗ We NEVER Do This

  • Accept payment for positive reviews or rankings
  • Allow brands to review or approve content before publication
  • Rank products based on affiliate commission rate
  • Suppress negative findings due to commercial relationships
  • Publish unsubstantiated health claims
  • Accept gifts that influence our editorial judgment
  • Create content that could endanger readers' health
  • Remove honest negative reviews under brand pressure

03

Our Editorial Team

All content on ShamimGuide is produced and reviewed by a qualified team with relevant professional credentials. We do not use anonymous authors or unqualified content writers for health-related content.

Team MemberRoleCredentialsResponsible For
Shamim SarkerFounder & Lead ReviewerCertified Nutrition & Supplement Science, 8+ years health researchAll supplement reviews, editorial oversight, final publication approval
Dr. Rania K. (MD)Medical ReviewerBoard-Certified Physician, Preventive & Integrative Medicine, 12+ yearsMedical claim verification, drug interaction warnings, clinical content review
Priya N. (RD)Registered NutritionistRegistered Dietitian, BSc Nutrition, 6+ years clinical practiceNutritional content, ingredient efficacy analysis, dietary supplement evaluation
Tom M.Fitness & Sports ScienceCertified PT, Sports Nutrition Specialist, 7+ yearsFitness equipment reviews, sports supplements, exercise-related content

Each published article clearly identifies the primary author and — where applicable — the reviewer who verified its accuracy. Credentials are displayed openly so readers can assess the qualifications behind every piece of content.

Learn more about the people behind ShamimGuide on our About Us page.

👤

Guest Contributors

ShamimGuide occasionally accepts guest contributions from qualified health professionals. All guest content must meet the same editorial standards as our own content, is clearly labelled as a guest contribution, and is reviewed by our core team before publication. Guest contributors must disclose any conflicts of interest.


04

Product Selection Process

Products reviewed on ShamimGuide are selected based on editorial relevance and reader value — not based on which brands have affiliate programs or which products offer the highest commissions.

How we decide what to review:

  • Reader requests: Our most common selection trigger. Readers frequently ask us to review specific products — these requests are prioritised based on demand.
  • Market prominence: Products that are widely marketed, frequently purchased, or heavily promoted deserve scrutiny whether or not they deserve a positive review.
  • New formulations or launches: When a brand updates a product formula or launches a new product in a category we cover, we review the new version.
  • Safety alerts or regulatory action: If a product in our library receives a regulatory warning, adverse event report, or recall, we prioritise updating or reviewing that content immediately.
  • Category gaps: Our editorial team identifies categories where readers lack quality, independent guidance and proactively builds coverage.
What does NOT drive product selection: Commission rates, brand relationships, advertising budgets, brand reputation alone, or how much a brand wants to be reviewed. Products we receive review requests for from brands undergo extra scrutiny to ensure objectivity.

05

Our 5-Step Review Methodology

Every product review published on ShamimGuide follows the same structured, evidence-based methodology. No shortcuts are taken regardless of how well-known or trusted a brand may be.

1

Ingredient Research

We identify every active ingredient in the product and search peer-reviewed literature on PubMed, NIH, Examine.com, and relevant clinical databases for evidence of efficacy. We assess the quality of the studies (human vs. animal, RCT vs. observational), the clinical relevance of the findings, and whether the research has been replicated.

2

Dosage & Bioavailability Analysis

We compare each ingredient's dose in the product against the clinically studied effective range. Underdosed ingredients — a very common issue in the supplement industry — are identified and flagged. We also assess ingredient form and bioavailability (e.g., magnesium glycinate vs. magnesium oxide), and flag proprietary blends that conceal individual ingredient amounts.

3

Marketing Claims Evaluation

We examine every claim made on the product's official website, packaging, and advertisements. Each claim is assessed against the published evidence. Exaggerated, misleading, or unsubstantiated claims are documented and directly addressed in our review. FDA/regulatory guidelines on permissible supplement claims are referenced where applicable.

4

Real User Feedback Analysis

We analyse verified user reviews from multiple independent sources including Amazon, Trustpilot, Better Business Bureau, Reddit, and the product's own website. We look for consistent patterns in complaints and praise, pay particular attention to reported side effects, and cross-reference user feedback with our ingredient-level findings. We do not rely on the brand's own curated testimonials.

5

Expert Verdict & Publication

The lead reviewer synthesises all findings into a final verdict with a numerical score (out of 10), a clear pros and cons list, a summary of who the product is best suited for, and our honest recommendation. The completed review is then submitted for medical review (where applicable) before publication. Affiliate disclosure and a Last Updated date are added at publication.


06

Scoring Criteria & Weighting

ShamimGuide scores products on a 10-point scale based on eight weighted criteria. This framework is applied consistently to every product in every category. Reviewers do not have discretion to deviate from the framework without documented justification.

🔬

Ingredient Quality & Clinical Evidence

Are ingredients backed by high-quality, peer-reviewed human trials?

25%
⚗️

Dosage Accuracy

Are clinically effective doses used? No underdosing or proprietary blends?

20%
🏷️

Label Transparency

Are all ingredients and amounts fully disclosed on the label?

15%
🛡️

Safety Profile

Known side effects, drug interactions, contraindications clearly assessed.

15%

Third-Party Testing

Independent lab-verified purity, potency, and absence of contaminants.

10%
👥

Verified User Feedback

Consistent patterns from real, verified buyers — positive and negative.

8%
💰

Value for Money

Cost per effective dose compared to alternatives in the same category.

5%
🏢

Brand Reputation & Transparency

Manufacturing standards, certifications, and brand trustworthiness history.

2%
What is explicitly NOT a scoring criterion: Affiliate commission rate, whether a brand has an affiliate program, brand popularity or marketing spend, whether a brand has contacted us requesting a review, or any commercial consideration of any kind.

07

Content Types We Publish

ShamimGuide publishes several distinct content types, each with its own editorial standards and review requirements.

Product Reviews

Full 5-step evidence-based evaluation of individual health products. Always includes pros, cons, score, and expert verdict.

🏆

Best Of / Top Picks

Comparative roundup articles ranking the top products in a category. All ranked products must have been individually reviewed first.

📖

Health Guides

Informational articles explaining health topics, conditions, or supplement categories. Cited from peer-reviewed sources throughout.

🔍

Ingredient Spotlights

Deep-dive analyses of specific supplement ingredients — reviewing the clinical evidence, effective dosing, and safety profile.

⚠️

Scam & Warning Reviews

Critical investigations of deceptive products or marketing practices. Held to the highest factual accuracy standards before publication.

📰

News & Updates

Health and supplement industry news, regulatory updates, and safety alerts. Always sourced from verified primary sources.


08

Sources & Citation Standards

All factual health claims published on ShamimGuide must be supported by a credible, verifiable source. We operate a strict source hierarchy — claims are only as strong as the evidence behind them.

Source TierExamplesAcceptable For
Tier 1 — Gold StandardPubMed-indexed RCTs, systematic reviews, meta-analysesAll health efficacy and safety claims
Tier 2 — High QualityNIH, WHO, Mayo Clinic, WebMD (clinical pages), NHSGeneral health information and definitions
Tier 3 — Reference OnlyExamine.com, Healthline (cited articles), regulatory bodies (FDA, EFSA)Supplementary background information — always with Tier 1/2 corroboration
Not AcceptableBrand websites, press releases, unsourced blogs, WikipediaNever used as a primary source for health claims

We link to primary sources directly in our articles wherever possible so readers can verify our claims independently. We never misrepresent or overstate what a study shows — if a study has limitations, we note them.


09

Medical Review Process

Content covering the following topics is submitted to our medical reviewer (Dr. Rania K., MD) before publication:

  • Articles that make specific claims about treating, preventing, or managing medical conditions
  • Content discussing drug-supplement interactions or contraindications
  • Reviews of supplements targeting serious health issues (diabetes management, cardiovascular health, mental health conditions)
  • Articles providing dosage guidance for medical conditions
  • Any content where clinical inaccuracy could directly harm a reader

The medical reviewer has the authority to require changes, add warnings, or block publication of any content she determines to be medically inaccurate or potentially harmful. These decisions cannot be overridden by commercial considerations.

After medical review, approved content is marked with a "Medically Reviewed by [Name, Credentials]" attribution displayed prominently in the article header.

For important health and safety information, please read our Medical Disclaimer.


10

Conflicts of Interest Policy

ShamimGuide maintains a formal conflicts of interest policy that applies to all team members, guest contributors, and any external reviewer who contributes to our content.

Declaration Requirements

Before working on any product review or health article, all contributors must declare whether they:

  • Have any financial relationship with the brand being reviewed (employment, ownership, investment)
  • Have received free products, payments, gifts, or hospitality from the brand
  • Have personal relationships with the brand's employees or founders that could bias their judgment
  • Have previously published content for, or been paid by, the brand in question

How Declared Conflicts Are Handled

Conflict TypeAction Taken
Financial relationship with reviewed brandReviewer reassigned — conflict reviewer cannot review that product
Free product received from brandDisclosed in article — reviewer may proceed with heightened scrutiny
Personal relationship with brand teamReviewer reassigned or second reviewer assigned for independent verification
Previously paid content for brandReviewer reassigned — independent reviewer assigned instead
Affiliate relationships are not considered a per-product conflict of interest because we have affiliate relationships with many brands simultaneously, our scoring methodology is objective, and we publish negative reviews of products with active affiliate links. However, all affiliate links are disclosed at the article level regardless.

11

Affiliate Marketing Policy

ShamimGuide participates in affiliate programs. The following rules govern all affiliate relationships and content:

  • Reviews precede affiliate links. We always evaluate a product first. We do not seek out an affiliate relationship and then write a justifying review.
  • Commission rates are not disclosed to reviewers. Where possible, the reviewer evaluating a product is kept unaware of the commission rate to prevent unconscious bias.
  • All affiliate links are clearly disclosed at the article level using a visible disclosure notice before the first affiliate link appears.
  • A product can rank #1 on 5% commission or rank last on 30% commission. Our editorial scores determine ranking — not financial yield.
  • We link to non-affiliated sources when they offer better value, stronger evidence, or more credible information than affiliated alternatives.
  • No product is "required" to have an affiliate link to be included in our reviews or rankings. Many of our reviewed products have no affiliate relationship.

For complete details, see our dedicated Affiliate Disclosure page.



13

Content Update Policy

Health and supplement information evolves. A review that was accurate in 2024 may need updating by 2026 due to formula changes, new research, regulatory action, or shifts in user feedback. We take content currency seriously.

Content TypeStandard Review CycleTrigger for Immediate Update
Supplement ReviewsEvery 6–12 monthsFormula change, safety alert, significant new research, major user complaint pattern
Best Of / Top PicksEvery 3–6 monthsNew superior product enters category; top-ranked product changes formula or faces recall
Health GuidesAnnuallyNew clinical guidelines published; major contradictory study released
Ingredient SpotlightsEvery 12–18 monthsNew meta-analysis or large-scale trial changes efficacy or safety assessment
News ArticlesAs events developStory develops with material new information

All updated articles display a "Last Updated" date in the article header alongside the original publication date. We distinguish between minor copyediting updates and substantive content revisions — the latter are noted in an "Update History" section at the bottom of the article.


14

Corrections Policy

ShamimGuide is committed to getting things right — and to publicly acknowledging when we don't. Our corrections policy is designed to prioritise accuracy over reputation.

Corrections Process

📩

Error Reported

Via contact form or email with evidence

🔍

Investigated

Editorial team reviews the claim and evidence

Verified

Error confirmed against primary sources

✏️

Corrected

Article updated with accurate information

📢

Disclosed

Correction notice added to top of article

Types of Corrections

  • Minor corrections (typos, formatting errors, broken links) — fixed promptly without a correction notice.
  • Factual corrections (incorrect data, misattributed study, wrong dosage figure) — corrected and noted with a correction notice at the top of the article explaining what changed and why.
  • Substantive corrections (findings that materially change our conclusions or recommendation) — corrected, prominently disclosed, and where necessary, our rating or verdict is revised.

We do not delete incorrect articles — we correct them transparently. Readers deserve to see that we acknowledge mistakes rather than hiding them.


15

Reader Feedback & Content Challenges

We genuinely welcome challenges to our content. If you believe something we have published is inaccurate, misleading, or unfair, we want to know about it — regardless of whether you are a reader, a brand, a healthcare professional, or a researcher.

How to Submit a Content Challenge

  • Use our Contact Form and select "Content Correction"
  • Include the URL of the article in question
  • Specify the exact claim you believe is incorrect
  • Provide your evidence or source (peer-reviewed research preferred)
💬

What Happens Next

We acknowledge all credible content challenges within 5 business days. We investigate them fully and respond with our findings. If your challenge reveals a genuine error, we correct the article and credit you in the correction notice if you consent. We respond even when we disagree — with a transparent explanation of why.

Challenges from brands regarding their own products are held to the same process as reader challenges. A brand's belief that their product deserves a higher rating does not constitute a content error — only factual inaccuracies do.


16

Contact the Editorial Team

For editorial questions, content challenges, corrections, guest contribution enquiries, or media requests related to our editorial work, please contact us using the details below:

Editorial Emaileditorial@shamimguide.com
Content Correctionscorrections@shamimguide.com
General Contacthello@shamimguide.com
Contact Formshamimguide.com/contact-us
Editorial LeadShamim Sarker — Founder & Lead Reviewer
Response TimeWithin 5 business days for editorial queries; 24–48 hrs for urgent corrections

Related Documents

Questions About Our Editorial Standards?

We welcome all enquiries about how we produce our content. Transparency is not just a policy — it's a core value.

Contact Editorial Team →